What is defined as misrepresentation that does not result in a contract?

The correct answer, tort, refers to a wrongdoing or infringement of a right that leads to civil legal liability. In the context of misrepresentation that does not result in a contract, a tort can encompass various forms of misrepresentation that may cause harm or loss to another party, even if no contractual agreement was established. This misrepresentation might affect decisions or actions, resulting in damages, even though it does not constitute a breach of contract.

Misrepresentation in this sense may involve providing false information or failing to correct a misunderstanding that can negatively impact someone else's choices or actions. Since torts can arise from various non-contractual situations, it allows for the recovery of damages in cases of misrepresentation that results in harm, regardless of whether a contract was ever formed.

In contrast, the other options pertain to specific types of legal issues that are defined within different contexts. A fraudulent act typically implies intentional deception for personal gain, which may lead to a contract but is distinct from the broader category of torts. Breach of contract is specifically about failing to fulfill the terms of a contractual agreement, which would not apply here since the question specifically states that no contract exists. Negligence involves a failure to exercise reasonable care, which can lead to damages, but