Without which written clause cannot damages for delay be claimed?

The phrase "Time is of the essence" signifies the importance of timely performance in a contract. When this clause is included in an agreement, it explicitly states that adherence to specified deadlines is critical to the contract's execution. If delays occur and this clause is present, the affected party may claim damages, as they have a right to expect that deadlines will be met.

In contrast, the absence of this clause may weaken a party's ability to claim for delays because it is not explicitly stated that late performance would constitute a breach worthy of damages. Therefore, having "Time is of the essence" in a contract provides a clear legal basis for pursuing damages in the event of delays, establishing the expectation that timeliness is a fundamental aspect of the agreement.

While the other choices may pertain to different aspects of contractual obligations or risk management, they do not directly relate to the right to claim damages for delay in the same way that the "Time is of the essence" clause does.